Tuesday, February 11, 2014

The Legend of Lemonardo

The Legend of Lemonardo

His name was Lemonardo di Caprio. He was the ugliest fruit in Lemontropolis. When Lemonardo was in Juicing School, all the other fruits and vegetables said he would never make a good lemonade. One day he met a magic golfer named Arnold Palmer, who would teach him the ways of mixing iced tea with "bad" lemonade. Lemonardo, who knew his time as a lemon was drawing to a close, saw this as an opportunity to discover his lemon identity, his "Lemoty". He went on a journey to the Big Apple to pursue his dream of one day being the refreshing beverage of a young Albany High School student. Everywhere he went, he could hear the guiding words of Arnold Palmer as he continued his quest. Finally, one day the Big Blender, the most admired figure in the juice world, discovered Lemonardo and offered to make him famous. Lemonardo would become the fare of a new study called Lemontology, an exploration of the dreams of lemons. In the process, despite having to sacrifice himself, he would find his dream of greatness fulfilled. He would be forever known as "Lemonardo the Great Gatsby".
Share:

Sunday, January 26, 2014

On the Origins of the Cold War

When examining the causes behind the onset of the Cold War, several themes become evident in terms of the considerations of the two major parties of the conflict, the United States and the Soviet Union. The United States was increasingly enamored with anti-Communist sentiments, a fact particularly evident when looking at the campaigns of Senator Joseph McCarthy and his counterparts on the House Un-American Activities Committee. However, such sentiments were not new for the United States. Fear of Communism and socialism in general dated back decades to the early 20th century. These fears initially peaked with the response to the Bolshevik takeover in Russia following the First World War. The United States, along with other Western powers, attempted to intervene militarily in the conflict by supporting the anti-Bolshevik “White Russians”. This foreign intervention was accompanied by a campaign on the homefront orchestrated by Attorney General A. Mitchell Palmer. The McCarthy of his day, Palmer launched his infamous “Palmer Raids”, targeting actual and suspected Communists and anarchists. Anti-Communist crusades of this time were epitomized by the imprisonment of noted American socialist leader Eugene V. Debs during the First World War, as well as the ideologically charged Sacco & Vanzetti trial.
Share:

Wednesday, January 8, 2014

Thursday, January 2, 2014

"If", Part 2: Towards a Post-Labor Society

All too often we take an overly micro view of the world. We fail to see the long-term big picture, the light at the end of the tunnel. As I have already described, the ultimate goal of humanity is to achieve sustainable happiness. Technology allows us to do this. The world of the future could be a dramatically different place.

The resources we use will change profoundly. Paper, for centuries the bastion of information, is fast becoming obsolete. Computer technology, namely the Internet, will make it unnecessary for any information to have to be written or printed on a paper sheet. Books can be read on just about any device today, including e-readers such as the Kindle and Nook. Newspaper circulation is plummeting as most readers would prefer to read today’s news today, not yesterday’s. The postal service, already in dire straits financially, will likely cease to exist for the purposes of delivering the mail. Bills can be paid online, letters and cards sent by e-mail, and ads placed on websites and in videos.

It is not hard to envision a world in which students no longer carry textbooks or notebooks with them to class. Students everywhere will soon be bringing tablets with them, using them to take notes, read course materials, even complete assignments and take exams. Classrooms themselves are already transforming, as many have moved from the traditional “chalk and talk” routine to a multimedia Smartboard device.

CDs, Blu-ray discs, and game discs will quickly go by the wayside as media streaming through platforms like iTunes, Netflix and Steam continues to grow. I would not even be surprised if the phenomenon of scheduled television programming were to disappear, as audiences increasingly feel no need for their lives to revolve around  a primetime slot.

The household will be completely transformed. Security systems will integrate fingerprint, voice recognition and retina scan technology, replacing the old lock-and-key method. Climate control could take the form of heated and cooled floors, walls, even furniture, along with voice controlled thermostats and humidity controls. The same can be said of kitchen appliances, entertainment systems, and lighting paraphernalia; in fact, many of these things will no longer be stand-alone products but rather integrated into the house itself. Ceilings, walls, and floors could become interactive screens, used to post messages, photos, videos and calendars at any time.

Cities will remain the centerpiece of society, with dramatic advances coming here as well. Megalopolises will be connected by high-speed rail technology. Vehicles will require no human driver, as sensors will remove the prior possibilities of human error. Also, all vehicles will be electric powered, fueled by a completely sustainable energy grid comprised of solar, wind, hydroelectric and even geothermal and tidal power where possible.

The most dramatic innovations will come in the labor-intensive fields, where modern robotics technology will literally transform the way we do business. Robotic machines will be able to produce almost every good from start to finish, whether it be resource extraction, factory production, or customer delivery. The idea of stores will be done away with, eliminating the need for sales clerks or managers.

Money will be transformed, and perhaps even eliminated. The weaning of society off coins will continue, to the point where they are only made for collecting purposes. All remaining cash transactions will quickly be replaced by cards, or a sooner leap will be made so that all money, tickets, boarding passes and whatever else can be carried around on a smart device like a phone or even a watch. In theory, even, the whole notion of monetary currency will become obsolete as the whole basis of its necessity, the division of labor, ceases to exist.

Food supplies will be secured by the extensive advances in biology and chemistry that continue to be made. Further research will truly determine the safety and long-term viability of genetic modification and DNA recombination. It is possible that infinite quantities of safe, sustainable food could be easily produced in the not-so-distant future.

Genetic research will also unlock the secrets of aging, disease, and cancer, and potentially allow us to exterminate these processes once and for all. Humanity will not be made immortal (at least not any time soon) but the lifespan and quality of life will both improve exponentially. Improvements in access to contraceptives and prophylactics will ease the potential strains of overpopulation, particularly in the currently developing regions of the world.

The post-labor world will not develop into a world like that portrayed in the movie WALL-E, where humanity becomes so lazy that they are unable to so much as walk. Instead, the lack of a need for human labor will lead to an unlocking of the collective mind. Individuals today use their leisure time primarily to entertain themselves, in an effort to relieve themselves of the stresses of a workforce-driven society. However, a society without work will allow the individual to pursue their own endeavor, whether that be artistic, scientific, intellectual, spiritual or philosophical. This will lead to compounding further advances in human achievement, potentially to the point of evolution into an entirely new species.

Although immense progress has already been made, dangerous obstacles remain. The astonishing concentration of wealth and power could completely undermine the whole process, as it would not permit the equitable distribution of the progress of mankind. For this reason, steps need to be taken to reduce the forces of inequality and oppression in the world today.

Share:

Sunday, December 22, 2013

"If": The Future of Humanity

When we are children, our parents often read stories to us until we can read them ourselves. I was no exception. My mom used to read just about everything to me. One set of her books, however, she said she couldn't really read aloud to me. I didn't understand why; until later, that is. You see, these books were collections of Calvin and Hobbes comic strips, as written by Bill Watterson. Watterson was the master of this field. His work is perhaps the one comic strip that qualifies as both art and literature. The fact that he did so while seeking such little publicity or financial gain is remarkable.

Watterson's strip serves as a canvas for his many philosophies and outlooks. One of his earliest strips illustrates this beautifully. A Sunday strip, the first panel opens with Calvin pondering: "It says here that 'religion is the opiate of the masses'. I wonder what that means." The second panel then cuts to a television set, 'thinking': "It means that Karl Marx hadn't seen anything yet..." Like Calvin, I too didn't understand any of this when I first read the strip at a young age. Looking back on it many years later, I realize that it may have been the best line Mr. Watterson ever delivered. He is absolutely correct. Television has in many ways served as a 'unifying force', the method of homogenizing our culture. 

Reading this strip, I can't help but think of Ray Bradbury's seminal work Fahrenheit 451. In essence, that work was a view of a future of dystopian proportions. The rise of the television culture leads to a mass uptick in anti-intellectualism, in which people begin to loathe and then aim to destroy all published materials. The viewpoint shared by both Watterson and Bradbury is that television and mass media are dangers to society. They have a degrading effect on our collective culture. However, it is also quite clear that not all television is 'unintelligent', so to speak. Take for example, Seinfeld, one of the most popular TV shows of all time. Although ostensibly a comedy "show about nothing", the series was actually a grand sociological experiment. It placed fairly ordinary people in everyday situations, and had them do things that often went against the grain, against the norms of society. It explored the intricacies of human social structures that no other show before or since could ever hope to. 

Seinfeld and Calvin and Hobbes share a number of similarities. Both took their genres beyond where anyone else held taken them, from the realm of banal comedy to the promised-land of constructive entertainment. Both stood head-and-shoulders above the rest of the crowd as a result. Both went out on top. In addition, and more to the point, both represent media that are on the way out. 

That last statement may come as a shock to some, for it implies that television is nearing its end. This will be addressed shortly. First, let's focus on the comic strip. As Bill Watterson often noted, the comic strip has been in decline for decades. Beyond that, however, the newspaper itself is, to be blunt, dying. Most people simply don't want to read yesterday's news. The progress of technology means that they don't have to. The Internet has become a vital source of information for the vast majority of the planet's population. I do not think it would be out of the question to think that the newspaper will be close to extinct within a decade.

Do not think for one minute, however, that newspapers are the only endangered species, so to speak. Books, magazines, CDs, DVDs, even television will all be absorbed into this ever-growing monstrosity that is the World Wide Web. Soon textbooks and notebooks will be obsolete; students everywhere will soon be using tablets for study, note-taking, and assignments. The postal service (already visibly sinking) will be practically unnecessary for the purposes of delivering actual mail. Bills, letters, advertisements; all of these things can be handled through advanced, digital forms if communication. Even parcel delivery will no longer require direct human involvement; it seems likely that Amazon's dream of using drones as carrier pigeons will soon become a reality. I will go as far as to to say that paper money has outlived its welcome as well; bank cards and online accounts are quickly becoming the norm. 

Are these trends bad? Luddites and the Unabomber would certainly think so. WALL-E might lead some to believe "yes". And anyone who's ever read I, Robot or seen Terminator must be absolutely terrified right now. Technology is taking over! The end is nigh!

Or is it?

Quite the contrary, actually. Let's take a step back for a minute, shall we? Technology can be loosely defined as anything that makes humanity's life easier. That's really what makes us unique among all the other species of organisms on Earth. We have the ability to make our lives easier through external means. Stone tools. Fire. Farming. The wheel. All of these things are technology. 

Personally, I feel that we humans today are awfully shortsighted. We look only at the micro view of things, and almost never at the macro. What exactly, then, is the macro? That, my friends, would be the of achievement the ultimate goal of humanity: happiness. Every single human being past, present and future has had this goal on their mind in some form or another. However, very rarely have we ever really looked at how to achieve this collectively. In reality, though, we have been doing so without even realizing it: through our pursuit of technology.

How exactly do we define happiness? It is a term perhaps best described in the negative: happiness is the absence of suffering. Suffering, in turn, can be described as any undesirable human condition, such as hunger, thirst, overwork, poverty, illiteracy, pain and disease, among others. Therefore, happiness can be defined as the absence of any undesirable human condition. 

How does technology allow us to achieve happiness? As George Orwell stated in 1984, "From the moment when the machine first made its appearance it was clear to all thinking people that the need for human drudgery, and therefore to a great extent for human inequality, had disappeared.  If the machine were used deliberately for that end, hunger, overwork, dirt, illiteracy and disease could be eliminated within a few generations." This, to me, is the ultimate statement of the power of technology. 

Clearly, we have not yet reached this point of 'utopia'. But we are closer than most think. 

What does this world look like? It is a world where all human labor is unnecessary, as machines take up the burden once borne by man. A world in which all knowledge is proliferated freely, with no desire or need for the protection of intellectual property. A world in which anti-intellectualism has no place, as the leisure time afforded to all allows all to pursue the intellectual, the scientific, the creative. A world in which all the peoples of the Earth face no shortage of food, or water, or shelter, or clothing, or any of the other basic or complex needs of society. A world in which advances in medicine and living habits lead to the complete annihilation of disease. A world in which consumerism and commercialism are unneeded due to the equality of opportunity of resources. A world in which this equality of opportunity eradicates the divisions along the lines of race, gender, creed, nationality, ethnicity, disability, sexual orientation, or any of the other artificial boundaries drawn up for the purposes of exploitation and oppression. A world in which all of the world's energy is provided through inexhaustible, ecologically sustainable sources. A world, in short, in which no undesirable human condition exists.


Share:

Saturday, November 2, 2013

Monday, November 5, 2012